requestId:689cf18b0ed0e5.89563607.
導讀
曩昔十年間，中國經濟獲得了長足成長甜心寶貝包養網，也為其他國度的成長供給了鑒戒。這背后有哪些緣由？近日，巴西前游玩部部長、現任清華年夜學傳授福鑫（Ale包養行情ssandro Teixeira）做客中國日報《連線》欄目，帶來他對中國成長和相干題目的解讀。
中國的成長不是要挾
Q:China has achieved many economic milestones over the past decade, but the Western politicians' saying "China is a threat to the world" has followed all the way. What is your opinion on this?
曩昔十年間，中國經濟獲得了很多里程碑式的成績。與之相伴，東方政治家就“中國要挾論”三言兩語。對于這個景象，您怎么看？
A:I think we need to analyze this statement very carefully. When you say "Western", I think it’s too heavy, it's not Western, maybe mainly it's America and some allied European countries. Because if you go to South America, nobody's talking about China being a threat. If you go to Africa, nobody is talking about it as a trap. People who tell you that or peop包養網pptle who are 包養vocal about that are from some countries in the Europe, not all of them, and then there's the United States. So the question is, a threat to whom?
我以為這個說法值包養女人得細心剖析。當你說“東方”的時辰，我以為太普遍了。你所謂的“東方”，我以為不是東方，而重要是美國和其部門歐洲盟友。在南美，沒人議論中國事個要挾。非洲也沒人會商“債權圈套”。一向拿“中國要挾論”來說事的，是多數幾個歐洲國度，不是所有的，以及美國。所以題目應包養感情當是，中國對誰發生了要挾？
Another question is, why is China a threat? Maybe because the United States doesn't want to compete with anybody else? And China represents, not because China wants to, but represents competition to the US in terms of technology, 藍玉華瞬間笑了起來，那張無瑕如畫的臉龐美得像一朵盛開的芙蓉，讓裴奕一時失神，停在她臉上的目光再也無法移開。competition to the US in terms of production. So those are the main elements. I don't see China being a threat to anyone. China's foreign policy, respects sovereignty of every single country. China never invades, never declares war. We are talking about competition in a very narrow包養 field, that is economics.
題目之二在于：為何說中國事一個要挾？或許是由於美國不想和其他國度競爭？不是中國想要往競爭，而是中國在科技、制造的實力使其被美國視為競爭敵手。所以這些才是要害元素。我以為中國不會對任何國度發生要挾。中國的交際政策尊敬每一個國度的主權。中國從不倡議侵犯，也從不合錯誤外宣戰。我們所說的競爭僅限于特定的範疇，就是經濟範疇。
And that's natural because China wants to achieve development. And when to achieve development, you need to have, as President Xi Jinping says, dual circulation, internal market, external market. And if competition is not good, I don't understand, because the United States loves to say that they want to have free competition. So let China compete in the international market, so I don't see a threat in any way. I can see competition, I can see China trying to gain the market.
但這是很天然的事，中國要成長，想要成長，就要如習近平主席所說，完成雙輪迴，在內部和外部的市場無機輪迴起來。假如競爭不是功德，那讓我不清楚的是，為什么美國還老是愛好自我標榜“不受拘束競爭”？所包養網以，讓中國在國際市場上競爭，無論若何，我都不以為中國的成長是一種要挾，我看到的是競爭，是中國在盡力爭奪市場。
“一帶一路”建議
不是中國的“馬歇爾打算”
Q:The Diplomat compared China's BRI to the US's Marshall Plan in a 2016 article. What is your estimation of BRI?
《交際學者》雜志在一篇2016年的文章中將中國的“一帶一路”建議比作美國的馬歇爾打算。您怎么對待“一帶一路”建議？
A:It's completely different. Marshall Plan is a plan for reconstruction and for economic fostering. BRI is not that.
“一帶一路”建議和馬歇爾打算完整分歧。馬歇爾包養網打算旨在戰后重建和復蘇經濟。“一帶一路”不是。
Many people would say that the Belt and Road Initiative is a Chine包養網se initiative. Many people say that it’s a way for China to increase trade or increase investment outside. The way I see it is a little different. I see it as a cooperation platform.
很多人以為“一帶一路”建議是中國建議。也有很多人說它是中國增加商業、增進內部投資的方法。我的見解稍許分歧。我以為“一帶一路”建議是一個一起配合平臺。
So when we have Latin American countries and there's a discussion, how would Latin America take part in it? How could Latin America engage better? And again, the point that I'包養網dcardd like to stress is that Latin America can engage with many other countries other than包養網 China. Because China had the 包養網pptidea to create a platform, but China doesn't want to monopolize it an包養合約d keep the Belt and Road Initiative to itself. No, it wants to spread around the world as a cooperation platform. You want to be part of BRI. That's fine. If you'包養網;re not, it's okay. It's your option.
所以，當拉丁美洲國度參加了“一帶一路”建議后，本地就開端停止關于拉丁美洲國度若何介入該建議的會商，拉丁美洲國度如何更好地介入出去？我想再次誇大一點，這并不是只與中國打交道，由於中國只是發明了一個平臺，中國并不盼望一家獨年夜，將“一帶一路”建議占為己有。不，中國事包養網想向世界供給一個一起配合平臺。你想要參加，那很是棒。你不想參加，沒題目，你有選擇的不受拘束。
What I am saying is that if you're part of BRI, you would have enjoyed a club that can invest together, can do trade together包養網, can share different cul包養網tural elements together, can participate in discussion of the digital economy, digital transformation, societal transformations. So that's the important point.
我想說的是，假如你是“一帶一路”建議的成員，你就似乎參加了一個俱樂部，大師一路投資，一路商業，一路分送朋友分歧文明，一路介入數字經濟、數字轉型、社會轉型的會商。這點很是主要。
I've heard people say many times, if you're part of the BRI, China will invest in you, will buy from you. No, that's not the case. China never said that. What China always said is that we are creating, we are sharing a vision of the world of humankind where we want development and prosperity. BRI is a tool that can help us to achieve that. China never said that the only tool is our tool. There is no need for these adjectives包養網 in the discussion. What we have 包養網in the discussion is something that could help the world.
我屢次聽到他人說，假如你介入共建“一帶一路”，那么中國就會向你投資、向你買工具。不，并非這般。中國歷來沒說過如許的話。中國一向說我們要創立人類命運配合體，配合成長，配合繁華。“一帶一路”建議就是幫我們完成它的東西。中國從沒說過我們的東西是獨一的東西。這些話從沒呈現在會商中。我們在會商一些對世界無益的工作。
中美兩國不會脫鉤
Q:In the context of globalization, what is your opinion about the so-called China-US decoupling?
在全球化佈景下，您若何對待所謂的“中美脫鉤”？
A:In my opinion, it's very, very hard to have a decoupling. When you are the first and second economies, there is no possibility of decoupl TC:sugarpopular900